|
MONEY LAUNDERING COMPARATIVE TABLEExcerpts from State Department's 2001 report,
Each year, U.S. officials from agencies with anti-money-laundering responsibilities meet to assess the money laundering situations in more than 175 jurisdictions. The review includes an assessment of the significance of financial transactions in the country's financial institutions that involve proceeds of serious crime, steps taken or not taken to address financial crime and money laundering, each jurisdiction's vulnerability to money laundering, the conformance of its laws and policies to international standards, the effectiveness with which the government has acted, and the government's political will to take needed actions. The 2000 INCSR [International Narcotics Control Strategy Report] assigned priorities to jurisdictions using a classification system consisting of three categories titled Jurisdictions of Primary Concern, Jurisdictions of Concern, and Other Jurisdictions Monitored. INCSR priorities draw upon a number of factors, which include: (1) whether the country's financial institutions engage in transactions involving significant amounts of proceeds from serious crime; (2) the extent to which the jurisdiction is or remains vulnerable to money laundering, notwithstanding its money laundering countermeasures, if any; (3) the nature and extent of the money laundering situation in each jurisdiction (for example, whether it involves drugs or other contraband); (4) the ways in which the U.S. regards the situation as having international ramifications; (5) the situation's impact on U.S. interests; (6) whether the jurisdiction has taken appropriate legislative actions to address specific problems; (7) whether there is a lack of licensing and oversight of offshore financial centers and businesses; (8) whether the jurisdiction's laws are being effectively implemented; and (9) where U.S. interests are involved, the degree of cooperation between the foreign government and U.S. government agencies. There are approximately two dozen sub-factors that are also considered. A government (e.g., the United States or the United Kingdom) can have comprehensive laws on its books and conduct aggressive anti-money-laundering enforcement efforts but still be classified a "Primary Concern" jurisdiction. In some cases, this classification may simply or largely be a function of the size of the jurisdiction's economy. In such jurisdictions, the volume of money laundering is likely to be substantial, necessitating quick, continuous, and effective anti-money-laundering efforts by the government. Primary Concern jurisdictions will therefore likely receive priority attention from the United States. While the threat from jurisdictions classified under "Concern" is not as acute, they too must undertake efforts to develop or enhance their anti-money-laundering regimes. Finally, while jurisdictions in the "Other" category do not pose an immediate concern, it will nevertheless be important to monitor their money laundering situations because, under the right circumstances, virtually any jurisdiction of any size can develop into a significant money laundering center. Countries/Jurisdictions of Primary Concern Antigua and Barbuda Hong Kong Panama Australia Hungary Paraguay Austria India Philippines Bahamas Indonesia Russia Brazil Isle of Man Singapore Burma Israel Spain Canada Italy St. Kitts and Nevis Cayman Islands Japan St. Vincent China Jersey Switzerland Colombia Lebanon Taiwan Cyprus Liechtenstein Thailand Dominica Luxembourg Turkey Dominican Republic Mexico United Arab Emirates France Nauru United Kingdom Germany Netherlands United States Greece Nigeria Uruguay Grenada Pakistan Venezuela Guernsey Countries/Jurisdictions of Concern Albania El Salvador Niue Argentina Gibraltar Palau Aruba Guatemala Peru Bahrain Haiti Poland Barbados Honduras Portugal Belgium Ireland Romania Belize Jamaica Samoa Bolivia Korea Seychelles British Virgin Islands Korea, North Slovakia Bulgaria Latvia South Africa Cambodia Macau St. Lucia Chile Malaysia Turks and Caicos Cook Islands Marshall Islands Ukraine Costa Rica Monaco Vanuatu Czech Republic Netherlands Antilles Vietnam Ecuador Nicaragua Yugoslavia Egypt Other Countries/Jurisdictions Monitored Afghanistan Iran Niger Algeria Jordan Norway Angola Kazakhstan Oman Anguilla Kenya Papua New Guinea Armenia Kuwait Qatar Azerbaijan Kyrgyzstan Saudi Arabia Bangladesh Laos Senegal Belarus Liberia Slovenia Benin Lithuania Solomon Islands Bermuda Macedonia Sri Lanka Bosnia and Herzegovina Madagascar Suriname Botswana Malawi Swaziland Brunei Maldives Sweden Cameroon Mali Tajikistan Cote d'Ivoire Malta Tanzania Croatia Mauritius Togo Cuba Micronesia FS Tonga Denmark Moldova Trinidad and Tobago Eritrea Mongolia Tunisia Estonia Montserrat Turkmenistan Ethiopia Morocco Uganda Fiji Mozambique Uzbekistan Finland Namibia Yemen Georgia Nepal Zambia Ghana New Zealand Zimbabwe Guyana
|