jump over navigation bar
Department of State SealU.S. Department of State
International Information Programs and USINFO.STATE.GOV url
Advanced Search/Archive
TopicsRegionsResource ToolsProducts   Español | Français | Русский |  Arabic |  Chinese |  Persian
Countering Misinformation

False Allegations Regarding South Asian Tsunami Reported

Allegations say U.S. had "foreknowledge" of tsunami

The island of Diego Garcia.
Most U.S. military facilities are situated on the northwest portion of Diego Garcia. The tsunami hit the uninhabited eastern arm of the horseshoe. (U.S. Navy Photo)

Following the earthquake that triggered the tsunami in South Asia on December 26, 2004, two misinformation allegations appeared in the media:

    • The U.S. had "foreknowledge" of the tsunami but withheld it from South Asian countries while warning the U.S. base at Diego Garcia, an island 1,000 miles south of the coast of India in the Indian Ocean, thereby preventing damage there.

    • The tsunami was caused by underground nuclear tests.

Regarding the "foreknowledge" allegation, the facts are as follows:

Scientists at the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center (PTWC) in Hawaii, which tracks earthquakes and the danger of tsunamis in the Pacific, detected the earthquake immediately. Their initial calculations were that it was an 8.0 quake, which is ten times less powerful than the 9.0 quake it was eventually determined to be. Based on these calculations, their initial bulletin, sent 15 minutes after the quake occurred, judged that "no destructive tsunami threat exists," referring to the Pacific Ocean region.

The PTWC scientists then used slower but more precise methods to measure the earthquake. These calculations yielded an 8.5 quake (which is about one-third as powerful as a 9.0 quake). Based on this, the PTWC sent a revised bulletin, one hour and 5 minutes after the earthquake struck, warning of "the possibility of a tsunami near the epicenter," which was off the coast of Sumatra.

The PTWC had no way no detect whether a tsunami had occurred in the Indian Ocean because there are no tsunami detection buoys in the Indian Ocean, as there are in the Pacific Ocean.

Scientists at the PTWC only learned that there had been a massive tsunami from Internet news accounts, specifically an early Reuter account of 150 killed in Sri Lanka, which was issued three hours and 43 minutes after the quake. About a half-hour later, the Harvard University Seismology Department reported that its further calculations had estimated the earthquake's magnitude at 8.9.

Following the realization that there had been a massive tsunami, the PTWC did the best job it could of contacting authorities in the Indian Ocean region, but there was no system set up to accomplish this because the PTWC serves Pacific Ocean countries. In any event, by this time, the tsunami had already hit Indonesia, Thailand, Sri Lanka, and India.

Regarding the allegation that the U.S. base at Diego Garcia escaped damage because it was forewarned, the facts are as follows:

The Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command Detachment on Diego Garcia received the bulletin sent by the PTWC because, as part of the Navy's Pacific Fleet command structure, the Naval Support Facility at Diego Garcia routinely receives these warnings, even though it is located in the Indian Ocean.

There was no significant damage to the facilities at Diego Garcia, not because of the PTWC bulletin, but because of favorable ocean topography and the location of military facilities on the atoll. Diego Garcia is located west of the Chagos Trench, which plunges to depths of more than 5,000 meters -- one of the deepest areas of the Indian Ocean. The depth of the trench and the grade to the shores of the atoll does not allow tsunamis to build up to great height in that area. As a result, the tsunami manifest itself on Diego Garcia as a tidal surge estimated at less than two meters.

Most U.S. military facilities are situated on the northwest portion of the horseshoe-shaped atoll. The tsunami, approaching from the east, hit the uninhabited eastern arm of the horseshoe, causing some beach erosion and minor debris build-up, but no significant damage to military facilities.

The main proponent of the "foreknowledge" allegation, Canadian professor Michel Chossudovsky, has a long history of spinning conspiracy theories. For example, one of his allegations is that al Qaeda "is supported by the Bush administration."

Regarding the allegation that the tsunami was caused by underground nuclear testing, the facts are as follows:

• According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, "no tsunami of any significance has ever resulted from the testing of nuclear weapons in the past."

• The United States has not conducted any nuclear tests since 1992.

• The earthquake stemmed from natural causes, as earthquakes have for millions of years.


Created: 14 Jan 2005 Updated: 14 Jan 2005

Page Tools:  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version    email this page E-mail this article

Back to Top


      USINFO delivers information about current U.S. foreign policy and about American life and culture. This site
      is produced and maintained by the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs.
      Links to other internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.